Just to add my two cents (definitely shrinking in value against the Euro or the Pound even as I type...)
In England, Aromatherapy is inextricably linked with massage - a result of the history of the development of the therapy and the ground-breaking work of people like Margaurite Maury. Almost all the English courses I've reviewed would briefly look at the other methods of applying aromatherapy, and then concentrate a lot on the massage.
In America, where massage is a regulated profession in most states, Aromatherapy is very much separated from massage. Most aromatherapists are trained by distance learning, some from accredited, some from unaccredited colleges. Massage is part of the course, but is treated as one of the means of administering the oils. In other words, the face to face element of the courses is downplayed, and what is stressed more is the learning side of things. There are many massage therapists who tag on aromatherapy as another string to their bow, but there are just as many aromatherapists here who do not provide massage as a means of administering the oils. In fact, unless they were state registered and licenced as a massage therapist, many would be breaking the law if they used massage as a medium of administration. So here, you do have a far wider range of products, oils, balms etc as means of administration.
(Some schools even teach ingestion of oils - something the British schools recoil over. However, ingestion of oils go back to the beginnings of modern aromatherapy.)
Is a year too long for a course? Don't think so - Truth of the matter is, the knowledge is very important in aromatherapy - I think those of us whether in Britain or the US can shudder with horror remembering all those latin names and attributes we had to learn. And like any other course of study, we forget a lot of it because we don't use it in real life. I doubt I'll ever use oils such as Melissa (so expensive) or some of the more obscure ones in my syllabus - I do believe we all concentrate on a personal selection of oils for day to day use.
However, it's as much the therapist as the therapy: and that really is key. I've known people who just radiate the calmness of a healer, but can't do a massage to save their lives, but just talking with them, and getting their balms - made the whole day. I've known massage therapists who graduate from 750 hour programs who leave you feeling like you've just wasted your money on a back rub!
Now - is it better to apply the oils with a massage? I personally think so - after all, you're getting two therapies at one go!
At the end of all that, I'd say, take the course - if you want something that is purely Aromatherapy, the course Traceym mentioned sounds possible. However, I think you'd want to take additional massage courses, as Traceym is doing! Worth the investment.