- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
Here is one persons POV, what is yours.
Despite all the headaches brought on by the summit, there are still very good reasons why the G8/G20 process shouldn’t be dismissed.There's no question that this is one expensive event (really? $1 billion?) and unfortunately it's also been given a spectacular visual symbol in the creation of a faux Muskoka, complete with a $57,000-artificial lake and imported majestic pine trees.
Neither is there any question that security and budget considerations will keep people away from Toronto rather than providing an economic upside — at least in the short term.Then there's all the legitimate debate about whether or not the G8/G20 agenda is meaningful and whether that many leaders with that many different perspectives can make any progress on any issues.
http://money.ca.msn.com/investing/deirdre-mcmurdy/article.aspx?cp-documentid=24617655
Despite all the headaches brought on by the summit, there are still very good reasons why the G8/G20 process shouldn’t be dismissed.There's no question that this is one expensive event (really? $1 billion?) and unfortunately it's also been given a spectacular visual symbol in the creation of a faux Muskoka, complete with a $57,000-artificial lake and imported majestic pine trees.
Neither is there any question that security and budget considerations will keep people away from Toronto rather than providing an economic upside — at least in the short term.Then there's all the legitimate debate about whether or not the G8/G20 agenda is meaningful and whether that many leaders with that many different perspectives can make any progress on any issues.
http://money.ca.msn.com/investing/deirdre-mcmurdy/article.aspx?cp-documentid=24617655