Housewives band together in Richmond to shut dowm MPs

[Meahgan]

What do you think of this morning's news that a band of housewives, obviously very bitter and jealous ones, in Richmond has gotten together and written a letter to Mayor Malcolm Brodie asking to shut down Massage parlours because they are afraid that their boyfriends or husbands may be going to them and cheating on them.

I think it is very selfish of those housewives to do that. I'm not sure if they'll be successful, but why is it our problem if a bunch of housewives have boyfriend problems? It's ridiculous. Are they paranoid?

Why should that be my problem if I wanna see a girl? Opinions welcome.

 

[blast]

I have never had a wife... but if I have one, I will keep her employed somehow so she won't have time to do stupid things like that...

Just picturing my wife getting onto the news for doing something like that makes me sick.

 

[frankiegrease d]

Yes, because of course, all these housewives have to do is close MPs down and there is no possibly way their boyfriends or husbands can cheat on them.

 

[Dashing Geek is Bada$$]

At least married guys have been in love once in their lives. I'm still waiting to fall in love for 1st time.

 

[tori w]

Even if the MPs are all shut down,their husbands or boyfriends can still go to micros or low track to have fun.

 

[etenn]

They should just set up a DHMP (dirty house wife MP) so they can get back at their hubbys and make a few bucks on the side. Ad could read.....

Borded house wife with fuck all to do during the day but dream up shitty ideas will do FS for $250. I Don't take it up the shitter but my friend over the road will for an extra $5

 

[???? ?o ???????]

Confucius say, woman who put husband in doghouse soon find him in cat house.

 

[Kati]

Another thought on this subject.There are a lot of Asian guys (husbands and boyfriends) thinking their lady is working doing facials. Sometimes they are doing facials,nails and skin.Other times they are giving us other special services!

 

[jandy]

FUCKING HILARIOUS!!!!

 

[goddesskieryn]

I guess we could replace a once in a while release with a permanent mistress that we fall in love with, divorce our wives/lose the girlfriend. That would be much better... right?

Women have trouble differentiating between Sex and Love.

 

[Meagan]

On the contrary, their jealousy is quite understandable. From their point of view, they can't seem to satisfy you so you go elsewhere. When you go elsewhere, they really don't know if you'll end up leaving her for someone else even if you say it's just sex. After all, most guys give "good sex" as one of the primary reasons of being with the SO/GF when they begun the relationship in the first place. How are they supposed to compete against the endless supply of nubian, supple , slim and wrinkle-free 20 year olds willing to suck dick? If the roles were reversed, I'm sure most guys would find their SO/GF's antics to wear thin quickly.

Take it for what it is, cheating plain and simple. You don't have a god-given right to do this, nor were most of you honest in your relationships and you probably broke your promises. I call myself a cheater, because that's what I am. One day I hope to correct my mistake, but it seems I need to cheat right now. I hope it is not a label I have to wear forever.

 

[Xavs]

first off, the letter was faxed anonymously from a local photocopy shop. why anonymously? if those "housewives" were indeed housewives, why didn't they petition to the city council and mayor brodie directly face to face? too many irregularities on this one IMHO. my conspiracy minded guess is that it was sent by money-grabbing cock-sucking caucasian whores in vancouver because asian SPs in richmond cost them too much business. the letter basically told the pigs what they already know. let's not forget that MPs generate revenue for the city. more revenue means more "funding" for the pigs and they're not about to chase business out of richmond. not now not ever. if they were, there wouldn't be or hasn't been any MP in richmond at all.

nice try, you fucking whores. EVEN IF you're the last SP on earth, I wouldn't stick my boy in your dity kitty. instead of this cut-throat tactic, why don't you, for once, serve your clients well and at a reasonable price regardless of their ethnicity?

 

[Franky D]

Perhaps this was just not the way things were meant to be. Up until my grandfathers time, most asian cultures still allowed men to have more than one wife. I don't know when exactly did this end for europe, but evidence from historical records indicates that humans evolved from polygamous mating. Hence it was natural that a man would find a wife, be with her for some years, have kids and then marry another wife and so forth, provided that he could sustain such a large family. Females were at one time OK with this behaviour and there was no female left behind (divorce). We were evolved from this kind of behaviour, do any of you truly believe that a couple hundred or so years of being "enlightened" with the concept of marriage and monogamy can undo thousands of years of evolution?

I know so many older females in their 40s and 50s these days that discovered their spouse cheating on them, filed for divorce and got their revenge in their settlements. What good has this done for them? They are now bitter old ladies that have neither the looks to find someone else nor the heart to trust them. They complain about being so sad and lonely, some of them do re-marry out of desperocity to guys they never would've even looked at when they were young. Is that such a great thing that our society has "evolved" to this? We are brought up with this fairytale about love, marriage, kids, happily ever after and that is bullshit. Last I checked divorce rates in north america are closing in on 70%. You have better odds of keeping your money gambling in the casino than in getting married and you have a hell of a lot more to lose. I'm not going to re-iterate all the info I've gone through regarding this topic but this weblink pretty much sums most of it all up with a few worthy studies unmentioned.

http://www.igs.net/~rogersk/mono.htm

Think about it people! We have been duped, everyone get divorced now!

PS: I for one don't believe its the caucasian escorts stirring up the pot for Richmond AMP's

 

[Michael Myers]

Now there's a social phenomenon I wasn't aware of; an endless migration of 20-year old Nubians, ready to suck GBM's dick.

Actually, I think that part of North Africa contains a pretty strict Muslim society. I doubt if you'll find many Nubians amongst the nubile young SPs in our part of the world.

 

[Jarvis]

I saw that article too. i got the impression they were only targeting illeagal parlours? maybe a angry legit AMP owner? it said there was no contact info on any of the faxes sent to the press, so who knows how legit this is.

 

[raymond]

So that would be getting facials rather than giving facials?

 

[Pompal 09.]

LOL good one! My slip!

 

[Motherhood is cool!]

That's a fairly self-serving post. When men took on many wives, no matter what the culture, it was mostly wealthy/powerful men who did so. The reason was that the economy was such that if a woman wanted to survive and her children to survive, she needed to partner with a man who had wealth. After all, daughters were given away by families for they did not bring wealth to them, so these women were looked upon as liabilities by their families whereas the sons often brought home the woman's dowry and her resource as another household servant.

This is nothing to say of her love life, for though she was expected to provide sex to him and be loyal only to him, what she felt inside with regard to romantic love is not known. Yet she was probably forced to arrange her priorities such that mere economic survival mattered most. This pattern was the same in recent Arabic, recent Asian, current African and ancient European culture. This was not "evolution", nor was it "natural". It came out of sheer necessity as forced upon by an agrarian/serfdom economic system. That system gave advantage to men because it gave advantage to physical prowess and the ability to be mobile (women were much less mobile because they bore children for nearly a year at a time). Today the economy is completely different. Because of it, women can now do most things that men can, so they seek equality. It is the attainment of economic parity that allows them to demand a more fair transaction (ie: equal loyalty) from their partner.

It is true what you say of older women finding their spouses cheating on them, divorcing, getting a settlement, and being miserable. I've known a few myself. Not much happiness can be had in today's economy when assets are split, even though a woman may fool herself into thinking that economic independance through divorce is the path to it (happiness). The problem is the woman's expectation of her own economic equality, idealistic notions of romance, and expectation of attractiveness to future mates at a more advanced age. The truth is that though society (primarily the feminists) have emphatically sold them on the idea that they can now expect economic equality, it is otherwise. Even in today's economy, an older woman's prospects of becoming wealthy and retaining it are much worse than a man's, and because of this, economic necessity once again becomes the motive for finding a partner as it did in ancient times. She seeks a man who can provide for her, and that's what she will find attractive as those in generations past. And she will also find the same conundrum as those previous to her, that men are primarily attracted to one more youthful to them. Her prospects of finding the wealthy man are thus diminished, and she will have to reconcile the greatest probability that she will end her days poor and alone.

Today's economy demands two fully working and capable people for survival and for savings for a suitable retirement. It is no longer realistic to expect that the average man can be the sole provider. As more couples accept the notion that a partnership is first and foremost a friendship rather than a romance, they will consider that should the romance end, the friendship can continue. I'll bet that in the future you will see more divorced couples co-habitate rather than split assets, for example, splitting the family home to upstairs/downstairs with each one living in their separate suite. They will then be free to pursue romantic inclinations independantly of each other and still retain their collective wealth.

 

[Shauna]

It's just fucking ridiculous.

The city should have just ignored that letter - should never have made it to the press.

Like it was pointed out before, why not meet face-to-fact to air out the concerns? Even if the were junked-up ho's looking to get even with the AMP's in Richmond, they could have at least pretended to be housewives. If it was a vindictive housewife who's husband was really cheating on her, why not take him to court and get the settlement?

It's too fucking ridiculous.

 

[U.S.Veteran]

http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=80fa97fb-bc4a-4da6-86bf-0e43d7fb7250&k=42683

Going after all the competition for their husbands attention is a never ending battle they can't win. Massage parlours, micro-brothels, escort agencies, indy sps, SWs, mistresses, one night stands, etc, etc, etc aren't to blame for their husbands actions. If they have a problem with their husbands behaviour confront the source of the problem, their husbands. Talk about it with their husbands, get marriage counselling, accept it, or get a divorce cause harassing a few massage parlours isn't going to stop their husbands from cheating.