What do you define as a good massage b/c while I love IT in 30 min there's not much time for a good massage in the RMT sense.
I like B & S b/c the 45 min session gives more time to address all aspects of a good massage (sensual and RMT).
In addition to timing, price is better at B & S.
Try Cecilia, Rosa or Jackie for a good massage which I define as a thurough massaging of the spine, shoulder, neck, arms and legs with good pressure using fingers, palms, forearms and elbows..... note the style varies between these 3 ladies.
So why do I go to IT? Quite simply for the looks of the mpas. There's nothing quite like playing with an mpa that looks as good as Brittany Spears (Amber). But in terms of mileage its no better than anywhere else.
In conclusion to me B & S is better value but you have to choose more selectively than IT. IT's strength lies in the attractiveness of their mpas but you lose a bit in value in other aspects.
Actually there is one more advantage of B & S which is that for my fav mpas there I rarely have a problem seeing them when I want. But Amber I haven't seen since the summer because I can't be bothered to make an appointment since when I stop in its usually a spur of the moment decision.
Well that's my $0.02
Frank