Massage reviews are mostly FS providers in a MP.

[Theresa P]

Most of the reviews in the Massage Review section seem to go the extra mile and include "full" as the main service in the review.

The massage reviews are becoming all about f/s activity without the intention of any massage. Can we put more massage postings here, and place the reviews of F/S in Escorts?

My question is
What is the difference between full service provider that happens to be at a MP versus a Escort review? Location is my answer.

Massage reviews should be left for the actual massage provider.

A suggestion
The Massage section should be non-FS focused. Or have the reviews (and reviewers) contain at least 60% massage. (sensual, non F/S etc.).

While those who seek sensual massages enjoy the odd, F/S encounter, most who go to the massage providers are not into it for the F/S component.

Beside, most of the Massage listings in the GS, WE etc. are separated because of this - no F/S. Non-sexual seems to mean - no F/S - release yes.

my twenty-five cents. Thought I'd donate my civic time to eforum.xxx board rather than campaign for the civic elections
/p

 

[mary j]

I do agree, however, most pooners want to push a girl who normally only does massage with a tug into a bit more. Men's nature to conquer I guess. Also, many SP start out doing just massage and move into FS for more money.

Also, as brothels are not legal MP's are the front. Broadway Boadcare and others only list an "all inclusive" price.

Guess you can win!

 

[im a guy everyone]

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but the division between Massage and Escort is not to discuss FS in the Escorts Section and the massage in Massage section. This is a sex related board and there are two basic types of providers. Those who offer sexual services with a massage at least offered first and those that do not. It is not what part of your experience you decide to talk about in your review. If I revew a massage parlour or a micro or an indy that advertises in the massage section of the newspaper, I post in the Massage section.

 

[hello.]

I just looked at the online version of GS and found micros and FS SP's in both the Bodywork section (under Personal Services) and the Massage section (under Adult services).

If these providers are not able to know the difference and where they should truly advertise how can we expect members to do this? There is more than one place that puts ads in as many places as possible to attract as many customers as possible. Sometimes they use the same phone number sometimes different numbers.

 

[dan 1]

There is certainly a big grey area as to where these posts should go.My post was my perception of what was originally intended. It was not based in reality. I was mostly correcting (i hope) MYNANEISPETE who sees to think it is based on content rather than on the type of provider. Then again I could be full of shit as I often am.

The reality of it is that the Escort section is generally obvious indy escorts, escort agents and SW's. Msssage tends to be all MP,s AMPs and Micros. Asian indy's tend to be lumped into the massage area whether they like it or not probably because so much of the Massage section is asian already that people just tend to put them there.

I personally like it, as is, as I tend to go to AMPs, Micros, and Asian indy's which all happen to be in the Massage section. So it is one stop shopping for me here.

I do stray over to the escort section occasionally to read about the heroics of hatrick, hitrack and the boys to remind me of the good ol days when I was out cruisin' the mean streets.