Michelle/Shelley @ Arthur Spa

[Alexis]

There isn't alot of information on Michelle (aka Shelley) from Arthur Spa and the reviews are mixed.

I saw Michelle for the first time recently. She was on a shift with Nancy, Denise, and Eva (the new girl). Denise was unavailable so I gave Michelle a try. If you look at the pics she has sholder length blonde hair....

http://www.torontosplaypen.com/arther4.htm

She currently has long brown curly hair down to the middle of her back. She's very attractive and all natural and she's about 5'8" tall (once those heels are off). Her English is fairly good (better than Denise) but she may still have some problem with communication some times. I found the massage better then Denise as she was more liberal with the oil see: http://209.29.131.76/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=30152

She's playful and sexy and has a larger repertoire of techniques but I can understand some of the negative remarks. It appears that the girls here regularly work very long shifts every day whereas at most spas the girls will work 6-8 hour shifts 3-4 times a week. It is easier for them to get tired here, wouldn't surprise me if they put in more hours in a week then we do. Also, I think Michelle can also be a little more business like at times which some may take as being mechanical or cold.

The fee structure changed the last time I went (no 45 minute session)

30 minutes: $50
60 minutes: $100

Overall, I'd recommend Michelle/Shelley but if you venture out keep in mind my comment on her being business like at times and that she regularly works long shifts and could get tired. That may help reduce the risk of a poor session.

As with my post on Denise I will not discuss extras here nor in PM so please do not ask.

P.S. I really want to try Eva. She's extremely Hot in person. She kind of resembles Ivana Milicevic from the show "Mind of a Married Man" on the Movie Network and as the Russian model in that Monica Potter/Freddie Prince Jr. Movie "Head Over Heals"

http://www.hbo.com/marriedman/the_show/cast_and_crew/ivana_milicevic.shtml
http://www.allmoviephoto.com/photo/2001_head_over_heels_004.html

 

[Yvonne K]

What are the rates at Arther Spa? The previous post mentioned that its $50 for 30 minutes but how much is it for N/R or B/S?

 

[Pompal 09.]

In my book T,N,NR & BS are all extras and I consider anything above that to be "Extra" extras. I am not willing to even discuss whether she took her top off let alone anything else. Given the LE heat around lately (in general, nothing specific) and the reputation of a former spa where at least one of the Arther attendants previously worked I don't see the need to discuss even the most basic extra.

This is the second time I've put this in a post and I still get asked. If I don't put anything (or say PM me for details) I am willing to share, otherwise not. It's nothing personal but lately I find it prudent to keep a tight lid on all information and only share it will what I consider to be reputable posters with a long history on this board.

 

[McGregor]

Saw Michelle today and had a lousy time. No enthusiasm for her job. Little or no service, by even the most undemanding standards and I got grossly overcharged. And the whole while, she looked about as interested as if she were doing her laundry.

I will never repeat with this chick for as long as I bloody well live!

 

[Nicoke<3]

Wow... sorry to here that.

I must admit though that I've found the Russian women can be very professional (ie there to get the job done, non-GFE) if you don't find a way to connect with them.

 

[Newbie555]

I had Michelle for a session when she worked at Alden. I reviewed her back in March. It would appear that her hair is longer (must be a wig - hair doesn't grow that fast) and her English language skills have improved but, unfortunately, the detached attitude is still the same. She was very mechanical and probably should not be in the business. It's a shame as she is very good looking.

 

[tvcclan1]

Saw her again for the second time the other day and I must admit the session wasn't as good as the first. I noticed a bit of an attitude as well.

I'd rate visit 2 as borderline recommend (7/10 rating in my books - minimum recommend rating for me). Her looks alone are worth recommending but if she didn't look that good I would not recommend her based upon the second session alone.

I must have caught her on a good day the first time around (8.5/10 rating in my books). If session 3 is not any better then session 2 then I likely will not repeat. Will let you know...

 

[mshatswell]

Had the misfortune of having a session with Michelle yesterday. On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd rate it as a two. There was a rather rigid language barrier, and it was obvious she was only there for the money.

I won't be repeating there.

Saneboy.

 

[j t]

Also had the MIS_fortune to have Michelle too. Probably the worst experience in years, She told me she was to tired to massage me jumped up on the table & just sat there. On a scale of 1 to 10 I wouldn't give her a 1.

 

[Chrystal]

I don't know what it is but I guess we just connect. Saw her again recently for the 3rd time and it was better then the previous 2. The last time I visited Arther before that I chose Eva even when Michelle was available. I thought the jealousy thing might come into play on visit 3 but it didn't.

Sorry, to hear that you guys are having some poor sessions but mine haven't been. I think if she isn't at least a little attracted to a guy then frigid and mechanical may definitely be a possibility.

Oh well, YMMV as they say!

 

[shashou]

I don't understand why you even bother to post a review if you don't want to even give a hint as what one can expect in terms of Extras.
However I don't blame you as it seems most of the so called reviews on MPA's lacking substance (hiding behind the anxiety over LE) and are mostly nothing but hot air and chitchat.
Damn man gives us a break!
Granted I am not a MP goers but SC so in search of some information I practically went thought over 1000's post in this area and found nothing but useless posts and confusion.

 

[presidentflush]

What bothers me around here is that I have been noticing a few regulars keep putting rumors about LE lurking around thus constantly preventing reviewers from posting a half decent review turning this forum into kind of an enigmatic medium with many worthless chitchat posts!
You know police has many other urgent things to do than spending all the public

 

[LenaLumpLump]

Cyrus,

Use the search function on "Alden". Then do a search on "busts" (ie LE busts) and you'll see Arther is right in the middle of an area that gets lots of attention (second only to EBC and maybe more recently Brampton).

Before jumping to conclusions and making rash statements about an area that you are relatively unfamiliar with and where there is a different etiqutte read these Sticky threads (they're at the top of the MP section):

http://209.29.131.76/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=23699

http://209.29.131.76/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28050

 

[{Zombiez like brainz}]

That is exactly what I am talking about, too much B*S* all around
Now don't get me wrong I have no problem with being discrete but not to the determent of the purpose of the review!
A reader should be able to make an educated guess by reading ones review on who to see or avoid & why period.
Now look at your own original post, almost one page with very litter useful information but the obvious; even then the subsequent comments rejected your recommendation.
Now I am not trying to pick on you but just to point out my frustration with the trend on what I have been reading here in the MP area that is all

 

[fernypool]

In the MP section the information most guys are looking for are the following:
1) How clean is the spa and where is it located. There are some really unclean places out there so that matters.
2) How attractive is the attendant.
3) How is the attendant's massage skills. These are body rub places so this is part of the package.
4) What extras/what mileage is available.

In my post I felt I address all of these in one form or another (links, description, disclaimer on extras).

I didn't take your comments as an attack and I sensed your frustration. The whole thing in the MP section is I think YMMV applies more readily here then in the SC section. At least at a SC you can sense a ladies mood before commiting to go to the VIP and if necessary cut the dances short once there. In the MP world you often make a monetary commitment at the onset (door fee and extras). In the SC scene you are able to do more scouting then in the MP scene where sometimes instead of walk-ins you have to book ahead - hence commiting yourself.

As a result of the monetary commitments we would be making, we often speak in a more generalistic way because there is no guarantee that everyone will "Click" with an attendant. In the SC scene it may cost you $60-80 to find that out but in the MP scene it could cost you $100-$260 to find that out. Due to the greater potential outlay of money more research is required in this section as we can't just go into a MP and sit in the lobby to scope things out.

LE and by-law official are only one reason for not discussing extras, YMMV is the other. Even the most glorified attendants have had unhappy customers. It may be frustrating but at least it's still ultimately our own call whether or not to go and see an attendant. I'd be more pissed of if someone came out a stated someone is a "Must See" and I drop $200 for a terrible session.

 

[naci]

I have seen michelle two weeks ago and had a great time.

big