My response about posting details......

[jee bus]

This will probably get deleted but....WTF. (for you snakey)

Like I said, I

 

[tombgeek]

Okay

 

[ashers]

Now that's what I call MSOG

 

[raiders_fan479]

"slow down your posts guys

the delete button popped off the keyboard, slow down......WAAAAAAAAAAAA""

 

[Pompal 09.]

First of all its not the cops, its the by law officers that are harrassing the licensed MP's. Its the by law officers who are threatening the property owners with criminal charges for allowing unlicensed MP's on their properties.

The same bylaw officers are showing these property owners threads posted on the review boards and telling them that its considered a bawdy house. The owners get nervous and dont want the hassle of dealing with potential criminal charges. So they are slowly forcing the mp's out.

The licensed MP's are being shown threads talking about body slides and releases and prices. They are threatening to revoke the licenses. One of the conditions that I am aware of with the licensed MP's is that they are not allowed to advertise. Its not the same rules in every town or city. Which makes it hard to determine what is against the bylaws in this town and that city.

Now we all know that not every mpa or every mp offers nudity or offers body slides or even offers release. It happens at some places and some more than others.

It's very easy to write a review without telling people what you paid or what you got. Because you can review the lady's outstanding massage skills. You know, she really found the problem spot and was able to work the tension out of the stiff muscles. After the massage was over you felt like a million bucks or 5 bucks if it wasnt that great....

Use your imaginations guys, get creative but just dont be explicit in the services that you received. After all, you only have yourselves to blame when your favourite mp is forced to close and the ladies scatter to the 4 winds. All because some bylaw officer suddenly has an excuse to actually earn his paycheque.

 

[TrikKi nikKi]

I usually on get one shot. What did you pay for 16 releases?

 

[Cypriot Princess]

read "only" not "on". Wouldn't want to give anyone the wrong idea.

 

[sephienie]

Of course you are right Big Ben. And I expect there are a lot of people that agree with you who recognize that its not worth the effort to disagree with those who control this board. Even so, I appreciated reading your thoughts about explicit review, but when the final word in any argument is "Well its Fred's board and he can do what he wants" (I don't think he has actually ever said that. Others say it for him.) Lets face it, the advertisers call the shots on this board. Fred and the advertisers are in the business of making money, and when that goal conflicts with the needs of those who post and benefit from the information in the reviews, we will get the short end of the stick every time. I'm afraid there isn't much we can do about it. Maybe if the moderators would tell us exactly which advertisers are complaining about explicit details in the reviews, we could oblige them by not writing reviews about their establishments.

 

[nonya]

Who said you had to stop posting reviews? The question is about posting details, like BS or talking about the release, or describing intimate details about the girls body that you would only know if she was naked. All of these things are illegal in MP's and can get licensed places in trouble with bylaw. What's so hard about this?



My guess is you don't hear half of what really goes on behind the scenes. MP owners do not come on the boards and tell you that their bylaw officer was in today and told me about such and such review that was written about such and such girl and mentions that she did a body slide. Or you don't hear about the girls who get tickets and fines for being caught nude while giving a massage. Of course you don't care about that stuff. You didn't get the fine. You didn't get the threats from bylaw to close you down. Who cares right, there are hundreds of mp's around the city.

One day not too long ago I was in a little known mp that never gets reviewed here. I met the owner. He told me about bylaw and the pressure they were putting on him. And he had no reviews on massageplanet.net. Imagine the pressure they can apply when they read in print about the stuff going on in mp's that are popular.



Yes, in some areas they definitely are. Keep going as you are and you'll ensure that you help them do their job. Be proud of yourself after when your favourite place gets axed.



My guess is you could have done a fine job without mentioning the BS and the good mileage.



I considered calling Rusty but he's not quite my type. I prefer red heads with big boobs. Natural only please. Know any?

 

[I heart you]

Since when has that stopped anyone ? If it's something you believe in, it's always worth trying to get your point across. My guess is that in this case many realise there is legitimacy to their enforcing the guidelines.

I would agree that in many cases advertisers have a big influence on massageplanet.net, but I do not believe this to be the primary factor, in this case.



The bottom line is that waving things around in peoples faces that are deemed illegal, at this point, can only do more harm than good.

It's easy for us, who hide behind handles to make judgements as to what is or is not detrimental to the career of mpa's and the business of MP's ...